I believe all children are full of remarkable possibilities and I look forward to helping each student reach his or her potential. My two most important rules are: I believe that each student is responsible for his or her own learning.
By Kenneth Bernstein You are a college professor. I have just retired as a high school teacher.
I have some bad news for you. In case you do not already see what is happening, I want to warn you of what to expect from the students who will be arriving in your classroom, even if you teach in a highly selective institution. While it is true that the US Department of Education is now issuing waivers on some of the provisions of the law to certain states, those states must agree to other provisions that will have as deleterious an effect on real student learning as did No Child Left Behind—we have already seen that in public schools, most notably in high schools.
Troubling Assessments My primary course as a teacher was government, and for the last seven years that included three or four out of six sections of Advanced Placement AP US Government and Politics.
My students, mostly tenth-graders, were quite bright, but already I was seeing the impact of federal education policy on their learning and skills. With test scores serving as the primary if not the sole measure of student performance and, increasingly, teacher evaluation, anything not being tested was given short shrift.
Further, most of the tests being used consist primarily or solely of multiple-choice items, which are cheaper to develop, administer, and score than are tests that include constructed responses such as essays.
Even when a state has tests that include writing, the level of writing required for such tests often does not demand that higher-level thinking be demonstrated, nor does it require proper grammar, usage, syntax, and structure. Thus, students arriving in our high school lacked experience and knowledge about how to do the kinds of writing that are expected at higher levels of education.
Recognizing this, those of us in public schools do what we can to work on those higher-order skills, but we are limited.
Remember, high schools also have tests—No Child Left Behind and its progeny such as Race to the Top require testing at least once in high school in reading and math. High schools are also forced to focus on preparing students for tests, and that leads to a narrowing of what we can accomplish in our classrooms.
I mentioned that at least half my students were in AP classes. The explosive growth of these classes, driven in part by high school rankings like the yearly Challenge Index created by Jay Mathews of the Washington Post, is also responsible for some of the problems you will encounter with students entering your institutions.
The College Board did recognize that not everything being labeled as AP met the standards of a college-level course, so it required teachers to submit syllabi for approval to ensure a minimal degree of rigor, at least on paper.
But many of the courses still focus on the AP exam, and that focus can be as detrimental to learning as the kinds of tests imposed under No Child Left Behind.
I served several times as a reader for the examination that follows the course. I saw several problems. If a student hits the points on the rubric, he or she gets the points for that rubric.
There is no consideration of grammar or rhetoric, nor is credit given or a score reduced based on the format of the answer. A student who takes time to construct a clear topic sentence and a proper conclusion gets no credit for those words.
Thus, a teacher might prepare the student to answer those questions in a format that is not good writing by any standard. If, as a teacher, you want your students to do their best, you have to have them practice what is effectively bad writing— no introduction, no conclusion, just hit the points of the rubric and provide the necessary factual support.
Some critical thinking may be involved, at least, but the approach works against development of the kinds of writing that would be expected in a true college-level course in government and politics.
My students did well on those questions because we practiced bad writing. My teaching was not evaluated on the basis of how well my students did, but I felt I had a responsibility to prepare them for the examination in a way that could result in their obtaining college credit.
I would like to believe that I prepared them to think more critically and to present cogent arguments, but I could not simultaneously prepare them to do well on that portion of the test and teach them to write in a fashion that would properly serve them at higher levels of education. Even during those times when I could assign work that required proper writing, I was limited in how much work I could do on their writing.
I had too many students. In my final year, with four sections of Advanced Placement, I had AP students as well as an additional forty-six students in my other two classes. A teacher cannot possibly give that many students the individualized attention they need to improve their writing.Kid-friendly Writing Rubrics & Checklists.
Address all 10 Common Core Standards for Grades 3, 4, 5, and 6. 3rd Grade Narrative Writing. 4th Grade Opinion Writing 4th Grade Informative Writing 4th Grade Narrative Writing. 5th Grade Opinion Writing 5th Grade Informative Writing.
Providing educators and students access to the highest quality practices and resources in reading and language arts instruction. § Implementation of Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for English Language Arts and Reading, Elementary, Adopted (a) The provisions of this section and §§ of this title shall be implemented by school districts.
the five parts of a friendly letter. Students A.
Writing Process Writing Grade Level Expectations 2 Compose welldeveloped text using standard English conventions Create legible compositions with correct spacing between letters in a word and words in a sentence friendly letter grading rubric friendly letter song Credits, Citations, and.
Aug 11, · J Martin Sweet I was born and raised here in Santa Cruz and I've taught in the Pajaro District for 17 years. Teaching is one of my passions in life and I feel privileged to work at such an amazing school as Rio del Mar. The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a group of states working together to develop a set of assessments that measure whether students are on track to be successful in college and careers..
What can you find on this site? This site hosts all of the tools necessary for Test Coordinators, Technology Coordinators, and Test Administrators to prepare for and.